Reloading equipment should support a deliberate, documented workflow. Faster or more expensive equipment is not automatically safer or more suitable.
1. Resolution
Resolution should be evaluated against the exact model, workflow, available space, current documentation and replacement-part support. Record the decision rather than relying on memory.
2. Repeatability
Repeatability should be evaluated against the exact model, workflow, available space, current documentation and replacement-part support. Record the decision rather than relying on memory.
3. Jaw finish
Jaw finish should be evaluated against the exact model, workflow, available space, current documentation and replacement-part support. Record the decision rather than relying on memory.
4. Battery
Battery should be evaluated against the exact model, workflow, available space, current documentation and replacement-part support. Record the decision rather than relying on memory.
5. Reference standard
Reference standard should be evaluated against the exact model, workflow, available space, current documentation and replacement-part support. Record the decision rather than relying on memory.
6. Case
Case should be evaluated against the exact model, workflow, available space, current documentation and replacement-part support. Record the decision rather than relying on memory.